Die Relativitätstheorie wurde Anfang des 20. Jahrhunderts von Albert Einstein entwickelt, da die klassische Physik einige Beobachtungen nicht erklären konnte. Es hat zwei Komponenten, die spezielle Relativitätstheorie und die allgemeine Relativitätstheorie.
Die spezielle Relativitätstheorie basiert auf den Grundkonzepten der konstanten Lichtgeschwindigkeit, und physikalische Ereignisse sollten allen Beobachtern gleich erscheinen und ohne große Anziehungskraft auf alle physikalischen Phänomene zutreffen. Die Allgemeine Relativitätstheorie ist die Idee, dass Zeit und Raum zwei Aspekte der Raumzeit sind, und was wir als Gravitation betrachten, ist die Krümmung der Raumzeit.
Wissenschaftler, die das Universum studieren, haben eine Lieblingsphilosophie, die als „Melancholie-Prinzip“ bekannt ist, die im Wesentlichen darauf hindeutet, dass es nichts wirklich Besonderes an der Erde, der Sonne oder anderen gibt[{“ attribute=““>Milky Way galaxy compared to the rest of the universe.
Now, new research from the University of Colorado at Boulder (CU Boulder) adds yet another piece of evidence to the case for mediocrity: Galaxies are, on average, at rest with respect to the early universe. Jeremy Darling, a CU Boulder astrophysics professor, published this new cosmological finding on May 26, 2022, in the journal Astrophysical Journal Letters.
“What this research is telling us is that we have a funny motion, but that funny motion is consistent with everything we know about the universe—there’s nothing special going on here,” said Darling. “We’re not special as a galaxy or as observers.”
Roughly 35 years ago, researchers discovered the cosmic microwave background, which is electromagnetic radiation left over from the universe’s formation during the Big Bang. The cosmic microwave background appears warmer in the direction of our motion and cooler away from the direction of our motion.
From this glow of the early universe, scientists can infer that the Sun—and the Earth orbiting around it—is moving in a certain direction, at a certain speed. Researchers find that our inferred velocity is a fraction of a percent of the speed of light—small, but not zero.
Scientists can independently test this inference by counting the galaxies that are visible from Earth or adding up their brightness. They can do this thanks largely to Albert Einstein’s 1905 theory of special relativity, which explains how speed affects time and space. In this application, a person on Earth looking out into the universe in one direction—the same direction that the Sun and the Earth are moving—should see galaxies that are brighter, bluer, and more concentrated. Similarly, by looking in the other direction, the person should see galaxies that are darker, redder, and spaced farther apart.
But when investigators have tried to count galaxies in recent years—a process that’s difficult to do accurately—they’ve come up with numbers that suggest the Sun is moving much faster than previously thought, which is at odds with standard cosmology.
“It’s hard to count galaxies over the whole sky—you’re usually stuck with a hemisphere or less,” said Darling. “And, on top of that, our own galaxy gets in the way. It has dust that will cause you to find fewer galaxies and will make them look dimmer as you get closer to our galaxy.”
Darling was intrigued and perplexed by this cosmological puzzle, so he decided to investigate for himself. He also knew there were two recently released surveys that could help improve the accuracy of a galaxy count—and shed light on the velocity mystery: one called the Very Large Array Sky Survey (VLASS) in New Mexico, and the other called the Rapid Australian Square Kilometer Array Pathfinder Continuum Survey (RACS) in Australia.
“I love the idea that this basic principle that Einstein told us about a long time ago is something you can see. It’s a really esoteric thing that seems super weird, but if you go out and count galaxies, you could see this neat effect. It’s not quite as esoteric or weird as you might think.” — Jeremy Darling
Together, these surveys allowed Darling to study the entire sky by patching together views from the northern and southern hemispheres. Importantly, the new surveys also used radio waves, which made it easier to “see” through the dust of the Milky Way, thus improving the view of the universe.
When Darling analyzed the surveys, he found that the number of galaxies and their brightness was in perfect agreement with the velocity researchers had previously inferred from the cosmic microwave background.
“We find a bright direction and a dim direction—we find a direction where there are more galaxies and a direction where there are fewer galaxies,” he said. “The big difference is that it lines up with the early universe from the cosmic microwave background and it has the right speed. Our cosmology is just fine.”
Because Darling’s findings differ from past results, his paper will likely prompt various follow-up studies to confirm or dispute his results.
But in addition to pushing the field of cosmology forward, the findings are a good real-world example of Einstein’s special relativity theory—and they demonstrate how researchers are still putting the theory into practice, more than 100 years after the famed physicist first proposed it.
“I love the idea that this basic principle that Einstein told us about a long time ago is something you can see,” Darling said. “It’s a really esoteric thing that seems super weird, but if you go out and count galaxies, you could see this neat effect. It’s not quite as esoteric or weird as you might think.”
Reference: “The Universe is Brighter in the Direction of Our Motion: Galaxy Counts and Fluxes are Consistent with the CMB Dipole” by Jeremy Darling, 26 May 2022, Astrophysical Journal Letters.
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6f08
„Amateur-Organisator. Möchtegern-Bier-Evangelist. Allgemeiner Web-Fan. Zertifizierter Internet-Ninja. Begeisterter Leser.“
More Stories
Die Falcon-9-Rakete von SpaceX stoppt vor dem Start, ein Milliardär auf einer Sondermission
Fossilien zufolge wurde eine prähistorische Seekuh von einem Krokodil und einem Hai gefressen
Die Federal Aviation Administration fordert eine Untersuchung des Misserfolgs bei der Landung der Falcon-9-Rakete von SpaceX